Philosophical Topics 49 (1):145-163 (2021)

Abstract
This paper develops an approach to humanist social critique that combines insights from Marx and Fanon. I argue that the concept of the human operative in humanist social critique should be understood both as the normative background against which questions of human flourishing and dehumanization can come into view, and as the evolving demand for universal human emancipation. Far from being abstract, essentialist, or ahistorical, Marx and Fanon show that humanist social critique operates through a dialectic between particular, socially and historically situated forms of oppression and struggle, and the universal species-context of the human life-form in which particular forms of suffering and injustice can come into view as instances of dehumanization. In developing this approach to humanist social critique, I defend humanism against three prominent objections: the charge of speciesism, the charge of essentialism, and the recent charge from Kate Manne who argues that humanism underdescribes relations of social antagonism and that recognition of humanity is compatible with inhumane treatment. In addition to considering the necessary relation between the particular and the universal, I also consider the relation between the psychological and social/political, arguing against the recent approach to the problem of dehumanization in the work of David Livingstone Smith.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philtopics20214919
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Humanism.A. W. Moore - 1904 - The Monist 14 (5):747 - 752.
“Humanism”.A. W. Moore - 1904 - The Monist 14 (5):747-752.
Philosophy and the Modern Mind: A Defense. [REVIEW]E. M. Adams - 1978 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):405-413.
Philosophy and the Modern Mind: A Defense.E. M. Adams - 1978 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):405-413.
A Defense of Littré.Jr Louis Belrose - 1892 - The Monist 2 (3):403 - 410.
A Defense of Littré.Louis Belrose Jr - 1892 - The Monist 2 (3):403-410.
Littré, A Defense Of.Louis Belrose - 1891 - The Monist 2:403.
In Defense of the Knowledge Argument.Jeff Mcconnell - 1994 - Philosophical Topics 22 (1/2):157-187.
Toward an Axiological Defense of Libertarianism.Daniel Speak - 2004 - Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2):353-369.
A Defense of Kant’s Refutation of Descartes.Edward S. Shirley - 1985 - Philosophical Topics 13 (2):185-193.
In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion.Michael Tooley - 1988 - Philosophical Topics 16 (1):225-254.
In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion.Michael Tooley - 1988 - Philosophical Topics 16 (1):225-254.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-16

Total views
1 ( #1,553,468 of 2,520,967 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,967 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes