Russell's paradox of the totality of propositions

Russell's "new contradiction" about "the totality of propositions" has been connected with a number of modal paradoxes. M. Oksanen has recently shown how these modal paradoxes are resolved in the set theory NFU. Russell's paradox of the totality of propositions was left unexplained, however. We reconstruct Russell's argument and explain how it is resolved in two intensional logics that are equiconsistent with NFU. We also show how different notions of possible worlds are represented in these intensional logics
Keywords Russell, Bertrand
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08066200050217977
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,392
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Gabriel Uzquiano (2015). Modality and Paradox. Philosophy Compass 10 (4):284-300.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kevin C. Klement (2003). Russell-Myhill Paradox. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Paul M. Livingston (2009). Agamben, Badiou, and Russell. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):297-325.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

44 ( #110,113 of 1,924,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #211,819 of 1,924,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.