Rediscovering Einstein's legacy: How Einstein anticipates Kuhn and Feyerabend on the nature of science

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57:17-26 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.005

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Eric Oberheim and Daniel sirtes).Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2000 - In John Preston, Gonzalo Munévar & David Lamb (eds.), The Worst Enemy of Science?: Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend. New York: Oup Usa. pp. 1.
Review of Paul Feyerabend, The Tyranny of Science. Edited by Eric Oberheim. Cambridge: Polity Press 2011. Pp. xii + 153. [REVIEW]Daniel Kuby - 2014 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 17:370-375.
Paul Feyerabend, The Tyranny of Science, ed. Eric Oberheim. London: Polity, 2011. Pp. xii+153. ISBN 978-0-7456-5190-3. £12.95. [REVIEW]Ian Kidd - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Science 44 (4):576-577.
Feyerabend, Paul K. The Tyranny of Science. Edited, and with an Introduction, by Eric Oberheim. Cambridge: Polity Press 2011 (165 pages, ISBN 978-0-7456-5190-3; £ 12.95 (paperback)). [REVIEW]Manuel Lechthaler - 2013 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 16 (1):386-389.
Two letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kühn on a draft of the structure of scientific revolutions.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (3):353-387.
The Landscape of a Metaphysical Battlefield: A Comment on Eric Oberheim.Leandro Giri - 2023 - In Pablo Melogno, Hernán Miguel & Leandro Giri (eds.), Perspectives on Kuhn: Contemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn. Springer. pp. 127-137.
Observation, meaning and theory: Review of For and Against Method by Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. [REVIEW]Nicholas Maxwell - 2000 - Times Higher Education Supplement 1:30-30.
Feyerabend on the authority of science.José Neto - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (4):687-694.
Feyerabend on the authority of science. [REVIEW]JoséR Maia Neto - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (4):687-694.
Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science.Matteo Collodel - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57:27-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
49 (#333,799)

6 months
5 (#711,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge.Paul Feyerabend - 1974 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Autobiographical Notes.Max Black, Albert Einstein & Paul Arthur Schilpp - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):157.

View all 35 references / Add more references