The Theopolitical Foundations of Strauss's Criticism of Modernity

Naharaim 1 (1):75-94 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I Philosophers and Prophets The tradition of the Falasifa tends to refute Plato's ideal of the “philosopher-king”, in which the philosopher is distinguished as the highest human type. In contrast to the philosopher, whose knowledge is incomplete and indirect, the prophet, through revelation, attains profound knowledge and truth. According to the Falasifa version of Platonic politics, the prophet, who represents the highest form of human wisdom conditioned by divine providence, is a founder of political community and a lawgiver.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The theopolitical foundations of Strauss's criticism of modernity.Matan Oram - 2007 - Naharaim - Zeitschrift Für Deutsch-Jüdische Literatur Und Kulturgeschichte 1 (1).
The Prophets’ Knowledge and Certainty regarding the Authenticity of Revelation.Yadullah Dadjoo - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 19 (74):109-207.
Islamic political philosophy: prophecy, revelation, and the divine law.Ludmila Bîrsan - 2011 - Annals of Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines 2 (1):85-92.
The Philosopher-Prophet as the Ideal Ruler in the Political Thought of the Medieval Iran.Dal Seung Yu - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 13 (51):123-140.
The Philosopher-Ruler.Elizabeth J. Jelinek - 2010 - Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):225-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-31

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references