Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):291-322 (1997)
Abstract |
Automated decision systems are often used to enforce legislation.As such, they have considerable regulating effects. These systemsregulate the behaviour of users and addressees mainly throughstandardization. This research classifies these systems intocategories according to which the regulating effects can bedescribed more clearly. Furthermore, this categorization resultsin a better understanding how problems encountered with atpresent can be avoided in the future. Many problems result fromthe way the development process has been organized. It turns outthe development process can be divided according to the time thesystems are developed with regard to the legislation they aim toenforce. Present procedures lack good monitoring of thedevelopment process. To this end, legal procedures are needed toensure that a legally correct product will be made, partiesinvolved should change their tune, system developers should bemore concerned with the legal status of the system and thelegislator should be actively involved in the development of thesystem. Moreover, an ex ante-evaluation should notice thepossible regulating effects caused by the system to ensure acorrect balance of the pros and cons. It should be ensured thatthese systems are effectively put to control. Transparency isindispensable.
|
Keywords | automated legal decision systems regulating effects system development transparency control |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1023/A:1008298517919 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
AI and Law: What About the Future? [REVIEW]Anja Oskamp, Maaike Tragter & Cees Groendijk - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (3):209-215.
An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems.John Zeleznikow - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):237-260.
Representing and Using Legal Knowledge in Integrated Decision Support Systems: Datalex Workstations. [REVIEW]Graham Greenleaf, Andrew Mowbray & Peter Dijk - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (1-2):97-142.
Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern. [REVIEW]Omar E. M. Khalil - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):313 - 321.
Two Examples of Decision Support in the Law.István Borgulya - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):303-321.
Developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems That Support Mediators: A Case Study of the Family_winner System. [REVIEW]Emilia Bellucci & John Zeleznikow - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):233-271.
The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System.Joseph Raz (ed.) - 1980 - Oxford University Press.
Legal Implications in Development and Use of Expert Systems in Agriculture.Willard Downs & Kelley Ann Newton - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
22 ( #512,690 of 2,504,809 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,809 )
2009-01-28
Total views
22 ( #512,690 of 2,504,809 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,809 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads