It may be a bad idea to waste resources, but is it illegal? Legally speaking, what does “waste” even mean? Though the concept may appear completely subjective, this Article builds a framework for understanding how the law identifies and addresses waste. Drawing upon property and natural resource doctrines, the Article finds that the law selects from a menu of five specific, and sometimes competing, societal values to define waste. The values are: 1) economic efficiency, 2) human flourishing, 3) concern for future generations, 4) stability and consistency, and 5) ecological concerns. The law recognizes waste in terms of one or a combination of these values. After identifying waste, the law seeks to eliminate it via targeted anti-waste provisions, which follow one of three approaches. First, “usage-veto” measures empower selected parties to halt perceived wasteful changes to resource uses. Second, “market-facilitating” measures prevent economic waste by encouraging and correcting markets. Third, “sustainability” measures proscribe wasteful overconsumption of resources fundamental to human and ecosystem flourishing. Through this framework, the Article synthesizes seemingly disparate property and resource doctrines into a coherent legal approach to the idea of waste. This overarching understanding of legal waste explains how individual anti-waste provisions originate and operate. Further, the waste framework serves as a practical tool for analyzing whether anti-waste laws remain in touch with current resource contexts and societal preferences. Finally, it offers theoretical insight about how anti-waste provisions work cumulatively to inject a necessary adaptability into property law
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Analysis of a Community Food Waste Stream.Mary Griffin, Jeffery Sobal & Thomas A. Lyson - 2009 - Agriculture and Human Values 26 (1-2):67-81.
Questioning Nuclear Waste Substitution: A Case Study.Alan Marshall - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):83-98.
Waste, Ownership and Bodily Products.Jean McHale - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (2):123-135.
Waste, Landfills, and an Environmental Ethic of Vulnerability. Hird - 2013 - Ethics and the Environment 18 (1):105-124.
Authors and Publication Practices.Michael J. G. Farthing - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):41-52.
Equity and Nuclear Waste Disposal.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1994 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (2):133-156.
Environmental and Social Implications of Waste in U.S. Agriculture and Food Sectors.David Pimentel - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):5-20.
Nuclear Waste, Secrecy and the Mass Media.Len Ackland, Karen Dorn Steele & JoAnn M. Valenti - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):181-190.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #621,313 of 2,242,820 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #401,142 of 2,242,820 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature