Classical Quarterly 23 (2):343-344 (1973)
Abstract |
Niebuhr saw that several paragraphs had been lost from the beginning of the Caesar; Ziegler suggested that the lacuna extended to the end of the Alexander. Both hypotheses are confirmed, if the identification of two new fragments is admitted. At 10. 11 p. 368, Zonaras is epitomizing the text of Caes.; he recounts the Story of Caes. 60. 3, and continues:Editors leave the provenance of the passage unspecified: ‘addita sunt pauca de nomine Caesaris‘ . The correction of the vulgar error might perhaps be an inference of Zonaras himself—though such an original contribution to historical polemic would be unique; but the erroneous version, at least, must come from somewhere. It is not found in any of Zonaras' sources for this period, nor in any surviving book which he certainly knew. Nor is it likely to be an addition from his own general knowledge
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800036867 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-02-07
Total views
6 ( #1,070,456 of 2,412,036 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,412,036 )
2015-02-07
Total views
6 ( #1,070,456 of 2,412,036 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,412,036 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads