What is non-Fregean in the semantics of wittgenstein'stractatus and why?

Axiomathes 4 (3):357-372 (1993)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF02229853
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Two-Dimensionalism: A Neo-Fregean Interpretation.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2006 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Josep Macià (eds.), Two-Dimensional Semantics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
An Argument Against Fregean That-Clause Semantics.Adam Pautz - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (3):335 - 347.
Thought's Social Nature.Charles Travis - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):585-606.
Eye, 'I', and Mine: The Self of Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Margaret Urban Coyne - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):313-323.
Hertzian Objects in Wittgenstein'stractatus∗.Gerd Graßhoff - 1997 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1):87-120.
Frege and Wittgenstein'stractatus.Irving M. Copi - 1976 - Philosophia 6 (3-4):447-461.
Sensation Terms.Peter Pagin - 2000 - Dialectica 54 (3):177-99.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
32 ( #174,900 of 2,210,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #221,824 of 2,210,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature