8. Why Is the Normativity of Logic Based on Rules?

In Cornelis De Waal & Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński (eds.), The normative thought of Charles S. Peirce. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 172-184 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/9780823293070-010

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Correction to: On the Logical Philosophy of Assertive Graphs.Daniele Chiffi & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2020 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (4):399-399.
Truth and games: Essays in honour of Gabriel Sandu. edited by Tuomo Aho and Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 78. Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki, 2006, vi + 322 pp.T. Aho, A. V. Pietarinen & Alasdair Urquhart - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):119-121.
Peirce: 5 Questions ed. by Francesco Bellucci, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, Frederik Stjernfelt.David Pfeifer - 2015 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (4):549-552.
Editorial Preface.Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (4):877-879.
Logic of the Future: Writings on Existential Graphs. Volume 1: History and Applications ed. by Ahti Pietarinen.Frederik Stjernfelt - 2021 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 57 (1):114-127.
10. The Normativity of Communication: Norms and Ideals in Peirce’s Speculative Rhetoric.Ignacio Redondo - 2012 - In Cornelis De Waal & Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński (eds.), The normative thought of Charles S. Peirce. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 214-230.
The normative thought of Charles S. Peirce.Cornelis De Waal & Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński (eds.) - 2012 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Logic as a Normative Science According to Peirce, normative sciences are the “most purely theoretical of purely theoretical sciences”(CP 1.281, c. 1902, A Detailed Classification of the Sciences). At the same time, he takes logic to be a normative science. These two sentences form a highly interesting pair of assertions. Why is. [REVIEW]Based On Rules - 2012 - In Cornelis De Waal & Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński (eds.), The normative thought of Charles S. Peirce. New York: Fordham University Press.
Sign System Studies , Special issue: Peirce’s Theory of Signs, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 369-371, Guest editor Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, University of Tartu. ISS N 1406-4243 , 1736-7409. [REVIEW]Claudia Cristalli - 2018 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 6 (1):168-175.
The Philosophy of Logic : 5 Questions.T. Lupher & T. Adajian (ed.) - 2013

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-31

Downloads
9 (#1,269,748)

6 months
5 (#838,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
Hong Kong Baptist University

Citations of this work

Peirce on Truth as the Predestinate Opinion.Richard Kenneth Atkins - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):411-429.
Pragmaticism.Charles S. Peirce - 2024 - De Gruyter.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references