A Comparative Analogy Of Principles Of Philosophical Systems Of Avicenna And Mulla Sadra

Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 8 (unknown)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dividing beings into creative, inventive and existential types, Avicenna considers emanation and effusion,i.e. first intellect, as belonging to the creative being and yet believes that the universe has a creative nature when compared to the first cause since the universe including the primary matter is not precedent to any matter. This - the creation of the entire universe- is creation in the extensive sense vis-a-vis the particular sense which is typical of incorporeal beings.After expounding on effusion and its particularities, Avicenna analyses the existential activity believing that effect is separate from subject despite the fact thatboth are located in one place: such conjunction, however, is merely an existential conjunction.Confirming the official position of the Peripatetics on the possibility of the co-existence of the existential activity and effusion, Mulla Sadra has succeeded in clarifying the connection between the creator and the creatures by shedding light on the illuminative relation. As he considers effusion in depth and relates it to the illuminative relation, Mulla Sadra develops the Peripatetic's ideas in a most efficient way.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-12

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references