Authors
Ramkhok Raikhan
University of Mumbai
Abstract
The moral reasoning of Rawls tends to follow Kant in so far as Rawls assumes reason as the primary faculty which decides moral action of what to do and how to do it. By assuming reason as the primary faculty neglecting interests and inclinations which are not encompassed by the primary goods, Rawls searches for an impartial principles of justice to safeguard the priority of ‘right’ over ‘good’. While in Sen’s moral reasoning well-being takes the central place and somehow reason as a faculty is subsumed as an instrument of our wants. When wellbeing takes the primary attention in moral discourse it becomes difficult for Sen to evaluate and rank different alternatives, since wellbeing can be understood differently bsy different people and people value different lives. However, Rawls’ abstraction from the actual situations of life seems to face theoretical as well as practical problems.
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 978-1-63435-038-9
DOI 10.5840/wcp23201812369
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Reasoning.Henry S. Richardson - 2013 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Studying Moral Reasoning in Business Settings: A New Methodological Approach.Elaine Mcgivern & James Weber - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:18-23.
Moral Reasoning.Gilbert Harman, Kelby Mason & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2010 - In John Michael Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.
What Good is Moral Reasoning?Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Mind and Society 10 (2):131-148.
Rawls’ Concept Of Justice As Political.Terry Hoy - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 41:116-119.
Morality as Right Reason.Stephen Theron - 1983 - The Monist 66 (1):26-38.
Intersectionality and Moral Responsibility.Margaret McLaren & D. Hoyt Edge - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 8:135-141.
The Place of Reason in Ethics.Vergil H. Dykstra - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 8 (3):458 - 467.
What is Moral Reasoning?Leland F. Saunders - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (1):1-20.
Educating for Practical Reasoning.Thomas Magnell - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:233-239.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-08

Total views
1 ( #1,516,870 of 2,462,873 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,363 of 2,462,873 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes