Sheffer’s stroke: A study in proof-theoretic harmony

Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 34 (1):7-23 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In order to explicate Gentzen’s famous remark that the introduction-rules for logical constants give their meaning, the elimination-rules being simply consequences of the meaning so given, we develop natural deduction rules for Sheffer’s stroke, alternative denial. The first system turns out to lack Double Negation. Strengthening the introduction-rules by allowing the introduction of Sheffer’s stroke into a disjunctive context produces a complete system of classical logic, one which preserves the harmony between the rules which Gentzen wanted: all indirect proof reduces to direct proof.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
34 (#485,615)

6 months
5 (#710,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Read
University of St. Andrews

References found in this work

The logical basis of metaphysics.Michael Dummett - 1991 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study.Dag Prawitz - 1965 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
The seas of language.Michael Dummett - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Introduction to mathematical logic.Alonzo Church - 1944 - Princeton,: Princeton University Press. Edited by C. Truesdell.
The Runabout Inference-Ticket.A. N. Prior - 1960 - Analysis 21 (2):38-39.

View all 13 references / Add more references