A Modest Proposal for Resolving the Apparently Never-Ending Evolution Debate: Reconsidering the Question

Studia Gilsoniana 8 (2):351–399 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author makes an attempt to show why (1) Darwin’s teaching in The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection and The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex cannot be “scientific” in a modern, classical, or any, sense and that, consequently, in them, (2) Darwin did not scientifically prove the reality of evolution of species. He claims that, while the question of the origin of genera and species is principally and primarily a metaphysical problem, Darwin’s ignorance of the nature of philosophy and metaphysics and the complexity of the problem of the nature of genera and species caused him mistakenly to frame this metaphysical problem as one of physics, more precisely as one of biology, which Darwin reduced to a natural history of living, physical beings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-19

Downloads
4 (#1,645,111)

6 months
3 (#1,207,210)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

.John Deely - forthcoming - Philosophical Explorations:1-36.
History of Christian philosophy in the Middle Ages.Étienne Gilson - 1955 - [Washington, DC]: CAU [Catholic University of America Press].

Add more references