Chemical Abortion in Australia

Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):6 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Riordan, Marcia Abortion providers and advocates want Australian women who face an unexpected pregnancy to have the option of choosing a chemical RU-486 abortion, instead of a surgical abortion. This article looks at this proposal, and discusses its possible repercussions. There is considerable controversy over this method of abortion, with promoters saying that it is safer, easier and private, whereas opponents call it DIY abortion or home-alone abortion and question its safety



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,412

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Victorian Abortion Law Reform Bill 2008.Marcia Riordan - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (2):7.
Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.
The other abortion myth—the failure of the common law.Kate Gleeson - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):69-81.
Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency.Richard Schoenig - 1998 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
Adoption Is Better than Abortion.Kevin McGovern - 2010 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (1):4.
Unscathed?: Abortion and mental health.Gregory K. Pike - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (4):63.


Added to PP

31 (#425,205)

6 months
1 (#869,379)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references