Possibilities for sets

Abstract

As central as the method of forcing is within set theory, it has yet to be incorporated into the philosopher's toolbox. That strikes me as a shame, since it may well have important applications within philosophy. One barrier is that typical presentations of forcing are overly dry and technical and make it seem inherently bound up with its applications within set theory. The purpose of this note is to try to rectify this. In particular, I will explain how the method of forcing can be seen as a way of constructing a certain kind of intentional model that philosophers are already interested in: namely, possibility models.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Forcing under Anti‐Foundation Axiom: An expression of the stalks.Sato Kentaro - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (3):295-314.
Forcing Indestructibility of Set-Theoretic Axioms.Bernhard König - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):349 - 360.
Coding the Universe.A. Beller, R. Jensen & P. Welch - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Forcing in intuitionistic systems without power-set.R. J. Grayson - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (3):670-682.
Against the countable transitive model approach to forcing.Matteo de Ceglie - 2021 - In Martin Blicha & Igor Sedlár (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2020. College Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-20

Downloads
29 (#135,560)

6 months
29 (#534,638)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sam Roberts
Universität Konstanz

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references