On the Specifics of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Influence on Social Sciences and the Humanities. Reply to Critics

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (3):56-59 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ludwig Wittgenstein and Performative Turn.Anna Yu Moiseeva & Alina S. Zaykova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (3):44-49.
Rule-Following and Social Theory.Valery A. Surovtsev - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (3):50-55.
Reply to Critics.Alexander L. Nikiforov - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 46 (4):50-51.
Reply to critics.Vadim Mezhuev - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):62-66.
Reply to Critics.Karen Momdzhyan - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 45 (3):45-53.
Reply to critics.В.М Межуев - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):62-66.
Reply to critics.Alexander M. Dorozhkin - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 54 (4):47-48.
On the Critique of Protest. Reply to critics.Alexander Yu Antonovski - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):53-58.
On the Critique of Protest. Reply to critics.Alexander A. Antonovski - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):53-58.
So, What Is Tractatus? Reply to Critics.Alexander L. Nikiforov - 2021 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 58 (1):75-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-17

Downloads
2 (#1,818,851)

6 months
2 (#1,259,626)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references