Realism, the War in the Ukraine, and the Limits of Diplomacy

Analyse & Kritik 44 (2):201-218 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the war in the Ukraine, realism has made a comeback in public discourses but it is not clear what realism actually means as it seems to stand for everything: from supporting the Ukraine against Russian aggression to the war is the West’s fault. This is the result of decades of not distinguishing between neorealism and classical realism and implicitly acknowledging neorealist storytelling of having systematized classical realist thought. The present paper is a further intervention to carefully distinguish between both theoretical perspectives to uncover what they can add to current world political problems. It finishes by asking if neorealist scholars like John Mearsheimer have a point that it is the West’s fault and a diplomatic solution needs to be found. They often refer to Hans Morgenthau not least because he was one of the most outspoken critics of the Vietnam War.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The impact of NATO enlargement on Ukraine crisis: Neorealist perspective.I. Muradov - 2018 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (1-2):107-114.
Rethinking Realism (or Whatever) and the War on Terrorism in a Place Like the Balkans.Rory Conces - 2009 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 56 (120):81-124.
What is Classical Realism?Richard Ned Lebow - 2024 - Analyse & Kritik 46 (1):215-228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-01

Downloads
56 (#293,769)

6 months
16 (#172,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?