Freedom of peaceful assembly and children: law and practice of Russia and Germany

Антиномии 18 (1) (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article provides the comparative constitutional research of the Public Assembly Law in Germany and Russia. In particular, the author examines constitutionality and permissibility of children’s participation in public assemblies. Using examples of real cases from Germany and Russia, the author considers conflicting views regarding participation and non-participation of minors in the different type of political rallies, such as assemblies, meetings, demonstrations, marches, and pickets. The article systematically reviews the existing international standards on freedom of peaceful assembly, relevant domestic legislation and legal practice with regard to public events with the participation of children. The author focuses on restrictions existing in German and Russian laws concerning children’s participation in public assemblies. In particular, the Russian Public Assembly Law limits the rights of minor children to organize three types of the public events. The German legislation – in the vast majority of the federal states – contains a clause, which states that as the marshal must act only adult citizens; however, it should be noted that in remaining three federal states – Lower Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Schleswig-Holstein – there are no limits on children’s freedom of the peaceful assembly. Special attention is given to the analysis of the provisions of the Russian educational law; in particular, the author investigates the principle of political neutrality of education and professionalism. According to this fundamental principle, any form of political agitation and campaigning is categorically prohibited in educational organizations; their workers are not allowed to advocate either for or against participation in any type of public assemblies. Based on comparative research, the author provides recommendations to prohibit involvement of children into so-called unauthorized public assemblies. However, the author stresses that this ban should be established in the Russian Law in the separate article, which would assign general liability for any involvement of minors in any type of administrative offences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Freedom of religion and children.Hugh LaFollette - 1989 - Public Affairs Quarterly (1):75-87.
Froebel and the Rise of Educational Theory in the United States.Meika Sophia Baader - 2004 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (5):427-444.
The Paradox of Participation Experiments.Alexander Bogner - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 37 (5):506-527.
The Internet's Negative Impact on the Development of Democracy.Zhang Qianshan - 2003 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 35 (2):91-99.
Solidarity, children and research.Barry Lyons - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (7):369-375.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-31

Downloads
1 (#1,910,345)

6 months
1 (#1,508,411)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references