Ethical regulation on researches at Brazil: do we need the 510 Resolution?

Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética 6:01-12 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since 1996, with the implementation of the 196/96 National Health Council Resolution, Brazil has risen on the world stage as an important country with regard the regulatory aspect of research with human beings. New challenges, amendments and complements lead to a new Resolution, the 466/12. Since the implementation of 196/96 through to the present day with the 466/12, some groups of researchers in Social and Human Sciences displayed dissatisfaction with the Brazilian regulatory system and they proposed a new Resolution specific to research in the field of Social and Human Sciences. Thus, Resolution 510/16 was created. This article discusses if this Resolution is necessary.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle.D. Morgan - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):524-526.
The Complexity of Resolution Refinements.Joshua Buresh-Oppenheim & Toniann Pitassi - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (4):1336 - 1352.
Closing Remarks.P. N. Fedoseev - 1971 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 10 (3):277-294.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references