Review: Andreas Hüttemann: what's wrong with microphysicalism? [Book Review]

Authors
Jonathan Schaffer
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
In What’s Wrong With Microphysicalism?, Andreas H üttemann argues against the ontological priority of the microphysical, in favour of a ‘pluralism’ that accepts physical systems of all scales as interdependent equals. This is thoughtful and original work, deploying an understanding of the relevant physics to mount a serious challenge to the dominant microphysicalist view.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axn007
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,475
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Chaos und Naturgesetz: Cartesische Probleme.Andreas Hüttemann - 2002 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 56 (4):517 - 544.
Naturzustand und Staatsvertrag bei Hobbes.Andreas Hüttemann - 2004 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 58 (1):29 - 53.
Leibniz: Raum.Andreas Hüttemann - 2004 - In Ansgar Beckermann & Dominik Perler (eds.), Klassiker der Philosopie heute. Reclam.
Determinism in Physics and Biology.Andreas Hüttemann - 2003 - Paderborn, Deutschland: Mentis.
Is Really Something Wrong with Microphysicalism? Andreas Hüttemann, “What's Wrong with Microphysicalism?”.Holger Lyre - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (1):167-171.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
501 ( #5,697 of 2,286,147 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #57,261 of 2,286,147 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature