Comments on Dadlez’s “Kitsch and Bullshit as Aesthetic and Epistemic Transgressions”

Southwest Philosophy Review 34 (2):5-8 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

08972346

DOI

10.5840/swphilreview201834226

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Kitsch and Bullshit as Cases of Aesthetic and Epistemic Transgression.E. M. Dadlez - 2018 - Southwest Philosophy Review 34 (1):59-67.
Comments on “Aesthetic Reasons and Aesthetic Shoulds”.J. Harrison Lee - 2021 - Southwest Philosophy Review 37 (2):17-20.
Comments on Green’s “Metacognition as an Epistemic Virtue”.Todd M. Stewart - 2019 - Southwest Philosophy Review 35 (2):21-22.
Comments on Josué Piñeiro’s “Epistemic Peerhood and Standpoint Theory.Deborah K. Heikes - 2021 - Southwest Philosophy Review 37 (2):13-16.
Comments on Wilson’s “Is Epistemic Permissivism a Consistent Position to Argue from?”.Todd M. Stewart - 2017 - Southwest Philosophy Review 33 (2):23-26.
Comments on.Julie Kuhlken - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (2):25-29.
Comments on.Sarah Tyson - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (2):37-40.
Comments on Anton's.Darian C. De Bolt - 2006 - Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (2):135-138.
Comments on Losonsky.Claire Horisk - 2004 - Southwest Philosophy Review 20 (2):185-188.
Comments on Bromhall.Jonathan McKinney - 2018 - Southwest Philosophy Review 34 (2):33-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-21

Downloads
19 (#793,166)

6 months
10 (#382,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Landon Schurtz
Tulsa Community College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references