Contemporary populist politics through the macroscopic lens of Randall Collins’s conflict theory

Thesis Eleven 154 (1):97-107 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper draws on Collins’s conflict theory to understand the contemporary surge of populism. It puts forward an account centred on citizenship rights and the state, and on ‘my nation first’ politics in four countries: the US, Sweden, India and China. Collins has identified a capitalist crisis, the dynamics of geopolitical legitimacy, and state-penetrating bureaucracy as three central processes in modern societies. Especially the last of these focuses attention on the conflict between cosmopolitan elites and ‘the people’, construed in exclusionary terms, which is on the rise in all of the four cases discussed here. The paper analyses the similarities and differences between them, and sketches the prospects for populist politics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-18

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why populism?Rogers Brubaker - 2017 - Theory and Society 46 (5):357-385.
Is America Breaking Apart?John A. Hall & Charles Lindholm - 1999 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Add more references