Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: Individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses☆
Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):255-265 (2009)
To examine the influence of hypnotic suggestibility testing as a source of individual differences in hypnotic responsiveness, we compared behavioral and subjective responses on three scales of hypnotic suggestibility: The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A . Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Berlin: Consulting Psychologists Press); the Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale . The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 53, 523–535); and the Group Scale of Hypnotic Ability . The Group Scale of Hypnotic Ability and response booklet. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 20–31). Behavioral and subjective responses to the CURSS were significantly different than those on the HGSHS: A and GSHA. More participants were classified as “low suggestible” on the CURSS and they reported subjective experiences more similar to everyday mentation. Attitudes and expectancies of participants who received the GSHA were less predictive of responding, but rates of responding and subjective experiences were similar on the GSHA and the HGSHS: A. Discussion focuses on implications for the use of group hypnotic suggestibility scales
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Hypnotic Behavior: A Social-Psychological Interpretation of Amnesia, Analgesia, and “Trance Logic”.Nicholas P. Spanos - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (3):449.
An Empirical-Phenomenological Approach to Quantifying Consciousness and States of Consciousness: With Particular Reference to Understanding the Nature of Hypnosis.Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar - 2007 - In Graham A. Jamieson (ed.), Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-194.
Citations of this work BETA
Furnishing Hypnotic Instructions with Implementation Intentions Enhances Hypnotic Responsiveness.Inge Schweiger Gallo, Florian Pfau & Peter M. Gollwitzer - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):1023-1030.
Similar books and articles
Individual Differences in Patterns of Hypnotic Experience Across Low and High Hypnotically Susceptible Individuals.Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar - 2000 - In Robert G. Kunzendorf & Benjamin Wallace (eds.), Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. John Benjamins. pp. 309-335.
Individual Differences in Patterns of Hypnotic Experience Across Low and High Hypnotically Susceptible Individuals. In (R. Kunzendorf & B. Wallace, Eds) Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. [REVIEW]Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar - 2000 - John Benjamins.
Hypnotic Control of Attention in the Stroop Task: A Historical Footnote.M. C. & W. P. - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):347-353.
Hypnotic Control of Attention in the Stroop Task: A Historical Footnote.C. M. MacLeod & P. W. Sheehan - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):347-353.
Is Hypnotic Suggestibility a Stable Trait?☆.O. Fassler, S. Lynn & J. Knox - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):240-253.
Seeing is Believing: The Reality of Hypnotic Hallucinations.Richard A. Bryant & David Mallard - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (2):219-230.
Hypnosis and Will.Irving Kirsch & Steven Jay Lynn - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):667-668.
Dissociated Control as a Signature of Typological Variability in High Hypnotic Suggestibility.Devin Blair Terhune, Etzel Cardeña & Magnus Lindgren - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3):727-736.
Individual Differences in Conscious Experience.Robert G. Kunzendorf & Benjamin Wallace (eds.) - 2000 - Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hypnotic Suggestibility, Cognitive Inhibition, and Dissociation.Zoltán Dienes, Elizabeth Brown, Sam Hutton, Irving Kirsch, Giuliana Mazzoni & Daniel B. Wright - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (4):837-847.
Fixed Versus Flexible Strategists: Individual Differences in Facultative Responsiveness?Jay Belsky - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):591-592.
Distal Similarity, Shape Referents, Subjective World, and Redundancy.Hannes Eisler - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):470-470.
Patterns of Individual Differences and Rational Choice.Vittorio Girotto - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):674-675.
Cerebral Lateralisation, “Social Constraints,” and Coordinated Anti-Predator Responses.Culum Brown - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):591-592.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads15 ( #302,590 of 2,143,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,273 of 2,143,762 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.