We Still Need to Improve our Research Writing Ethics

Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):35-38 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of current effort is too sentient that the people should have to know what is happening and to explore the reasons behind the veil of reasons so they can generate and amend their opinions and deduce their own conclusions. The most worthy asset of a researcher is to publish valuable research and must first be earned the scientific professional integrity and then maintained it. The scientific community must obey the scientific ethical norms and rules if they want to play its due role. Still, we are bearing ethical quandaries in our research and we have to solve them for advancement of research in scientific community including Pakistan.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics in Scientific Publications.Bezawada Brunda, Karso Liyi & Nayak Chaturbhuja - 2022 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):15-22.
Editorial Vol.7(2).Tahera Ahmed Ahmed - 2016 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 7 (2).
An introduction to research ethics.Paul J. Friedman - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):443-456.
Data Alteration.Barbara K. Redman - 2023 - In Erick Valdés & Juan Alberto Lecaros (eds.), Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume II: Scientific Integrity and Institutional Ethics. Springer Verlag. pp. 2147483647-2147483647.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-23

Downloads
5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations