Engram: Derrida's Reply to Stiegler

Paragraph 45 (3):351-365 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article focuses on two indices from Geschlecht III session XIII: (1) an apparently insignificant reference to Stiegler and (2) the recourse to the concept of the engram as a trope of other grammatological figures that are more frequent in Derrida's work. By interweaving these indexes together, the article suggests that Derrida's text can be read as a noteworthy stage in his ongoing dialogue with Bernard Stiegler surrounding the question posed by human evolution to any accounts of the history of life. Along this path, the article inscribes Derrida's (en-)grammatological history of life within the line of thought that goes from Richard Semon's engram theory to Simona Ginsburg and Eva Jablonka's contemporary re-elaboration of this theory. In doing so, it argues that, although for Stiegler Derrida's grammatology aligns with biological reductionism, the latter may provide the theoretical framework for current evolutionary accounts of life as plasticity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What have we learned about the engram?Jonathan Najenson - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):9581-9601.
Writing and Cosmotechnics.Yuk Hui - 2020 - Derrida Today 13 (1):17-32.
Stiegler, Foucault, and Epictetus:The Therapeutics of Reading and Writing.Kurt W. Lampe - forthcoming - Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-12

Downloads
13 (#1,040,625)

6 months
10 (#275,239)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mauro Senatore
Universidad Diego Portales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references