Authors |
|
Abstract |
In this paper we address two problems in Boltzmann's approach to statistical mechanics. The first is the justification of the probabilistic predictions of the theory. And the second is the inadequacy of the theory's retrodictions.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2006 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Was There an Ice Cube There or Am I Just Remembering It? Does the Reversibility Argument Really Imply Scepticism About Records?Daniel Parker - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (S3):587-603.
Similar books and articles
A Probabilistic Foundation of Elementary Particle Statistics. Part I.Domenico Costantini & Ubaldo Garibaldi - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (4):483-506.
Boltzmann, Gibbs, and the Concept of Equilibrium.David Lavis - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):682-696.
Founded on Classical Mechanics and Interpretation of Classical Staistical Mechanical Probabilities.Miklos Redei - unknown
Irreversibility and Statistical Mechanics: A New Approach?Robert W. Batterman - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (3):395-419.
Implications of Quantum Theory in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics.David Wallace - manuscript
Foundations of Statistical Mechanics—Two Approaches.Stephen Leeds - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):126-144.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
56 ( #176,159 of 2,401,843 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #198,161 of 2,401,843 )
2009-01-28
Total views
56 ( #176,159 of 2,401,843 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #198,161 of 2,401,843 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads