Does the finding of statistical significance justify the rejection of the Null hypothesis?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):293-294 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The soundness of Chow's (1996; 1998a) argument depends on the soundness of his assertion that statistical significance may be understood to signify that chance may be excluded as the reason for results. The examples and arguments provided here show that statistical significance signifies no such thing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Significance testing – does it need this defence?Günther Palm - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
Costs and benefits of statistical significance tests.Michael G. Shafto - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
Précis of statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):169-194.
The non-significance of straw man arguments.Niels G. Waller & Wesley O. Johnson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):226-227.
The Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure is still warranted.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):228-235.
Inductive strategy and statistical tactics.Paul Snow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):219-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
24 (#644,535)

6 months
9 (#437,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references