Does the finding of statistical significance justify the rejection of the Null hypothesis?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):293-294 (2000)
Abstract
The soundness of Chow's (1996; 1998a) argument depends on the soundness of his assertion that statistical significance may be understood to signify that chance may be excluded as the reason for results. The examples and arguments provided here show that statistical significance signifies no such thing.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00272440
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

2 ( #757,832 of 2,153,834 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,834 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums