Moral responsibility and the concept of agency

In Richard Swinburne (ed.), Free Will and Modern Science. New York: OUP/British Academy (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter argues for the incompatibility of moral responsibility and determinism. The real reason why determinism and moral responsibility are inconsistent is not moral, but metaphysical. The real reason is that determinism is inconsistent with agency, which is a necessary condition of moral responsibility.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

About the Needlessness of the Verb “To Be”.Dan Simbotin - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:231-236.
An Analysis of Semi-Compatibilism.Gan Hun Ahn - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:7-12.
Compatibilism from the inside out.Andrew M. Bailey - 2021 - Analytic Philosophy 63 (3):137-146.
An Essay on Free Will.Peter van Inwagen - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Freedom and Experience: Self-Determination Without Illusions.Magill Kevin - 1997 - London: author open access, originally MacMillan.
Free will.Derk Pereboom - 2013 - In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life.Derk Pereboom - 2014 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-30

Downloads
54 (#98,306)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Steward
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

I-‘Actual Instead’.Sarah Broadie - 2013 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (1pt1):1-19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references