The Case for Vegetarianism: Philosophy for a Small Planet. By John L. Hill [Book Review]

Environmental Ethics 19 (2):221-224 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hill explains that this book “is written both for non-philosophers and for students of philosophy. It is intended to say something both about philosophy, particularly applied moral philosophy, and about the argument for vegetarianism” (p. xiv). Since vegetarianism is an important topic in applied ethics, I had high expectations of this work. However, although the writing is commendably clear, and despite the fact that it is to be welcomed as the first book to bring together and discuss at some length four different arguments for adopting a vegetarian diet, this book is disappointing both by philosophical and scholarly standards.

Similar books and articles

The Naive Argument against Moral Vegetarianism.Peter Alward - 2000 - Environmental Values 9 (1):81-89.
The Philosophy of Vegetarianism. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Jost - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (3):273-276.
The Philosophy of Vegetarianism. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Jost - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (3):273-276.
Deep Vegetarianism.Michael Allen Fox - 1999 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
The Future of Meat without Animals. [REVIEW]Cheryl Abbate & C. E. Abbate - 2017 - Environmental Ethics 39 (3):341-344.
A Rawlsian Pro-Life Argument against Vegetarianism.John Zeis - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):63-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
221 (#94,810)

6 months
84 (#62,755)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William O. Stephens
Creighton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references