Agriculture and Human Values 7 (1):33-38 (1990)
AbstractThe question to be answered is why do different cultures respond to the land differently? The question is born in the tension between Native American and the Anglo macroculture valuing of the land. Using the philosophy of George Herbert Mead, it is argued that the land is seen as a social being ,in the same way that an individual sees another person. Mead's philosophy of the development of the individual begins with the relation of the developing self and a social other. That relationship defines acts acceptable within the society, including the acts of observation and reflective thought. Thus, the very process of development becomes bound by the society. As the individual grows, according to Mead, the social other (and the relation between the other and the self) become generalized to include objects of the environment, such as the land. The acts toward others now become acts toward the land. As the acts toward others have value within the society, so the acts toward the land take on the same values. The individual mind is never an exact duplicate of the culture, but is limited by the culture, which results in specific tensions as two cultures come together. Again, using Mead, it is shown that the morality of our response to the land is dependent upon the growth of the individual, and that that growth can be provided by the very conflict of the acculturation
Similar books and articles
Holists and Fascists and Paper Tigers...Oh My!Michael P. Nelson - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):103 - 117.
Implications of Customary Practices on Gender Discrimination in Land Ownership in Cameroon.Lotsmart Fonjong, Irene Fokum Sama-Lang & Lawrence Fon Fombe - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (3):260-274.
Ethically Evaluating Land Art: Is It Worth It?Sheila Lintott - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):263 – 277.
Prolegomena to a Metaphysics of Real Estate.Barry Smith & Leo Zaibert - 1996 - In Roberto Casati (ed.), Shadows and Socio-Economic Units. Foundations of Formal Geography. Technical University of Vienna. pp. 151--155.
The Land Reform in Independent Estonia: Memory as Precedent — Toward the Reconstruction of Agriculture in Eastern Europe. [REVIEW]Mark B. Lapping - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (1):52-59.
Evolutionary Emotivism and the Land Ethic.Brian K. Steverson - 2003 - Social Philosophy Today 19:65-77.
Bioenergy and Land Use: Framing the Ethical Debate. [REVIEW]C. Gamborg, K. Millar, O. Shortall & P. Sandøe - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):909-925.
Land-Grant University Governance: An Analysis of Board Composition and Corporate Interlocks. [REVIEW]Andrea R. Woodward - 2009 - Agriculture and Human Values 26 (1-2):121-131.
The Political Economy of Land Grabs in Malawi: Investigating the Contribution of Limphasa Sugar Corporation to Rural Development. [REVIEW]Blessings Chinsinga, Michael Chasukwa & Sane Pashane Zuka - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (6):1065-1084.
Melanesian Axiology, Communal Land Tenure, and the Prospect of Sustainable Development Within Papua New Guinea.David R. Lea - 1993 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (1):89-101.
Does 'Restoration' Necessarily Imply the Domination of Nature?Donna Ladkin - 2005 - Environmental Values 14 (2):203-219.
Book Review of" This Land is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil", by Wendy Wolford. [REVIEW]Leandro Vergara-Camus - 2013 - Historical Materialism 21 (2):169-178.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
American Indian Values and Their Impact on Tribal Economic Development.Jerry D. Stubben - 1991 - Agriculture and Human Values 8 (3):53-62.
References found in this work
No references found.