When natural time sequences were replaced by clocks, time became a measurable commodity and the ‘speedy use of time’ a virtue. In medical practice shorter consultations allow more patients to be seen, whereas longer consultations result in a better understanding of the patient and her problems. Crossing the line of time-efficiency and time-effectiveness compromises the balance between short-term turnover and long-term outcomes. The consultation has all the hallmarks of a complex adaptive system whose characteristics are not determined by the characteristics of the components, but by the patterns of interaction among the components. Systems are dynamic and change over time; the dynamic nature is not incidental, but necessary as complex systems operate at conditions far from equilibrium. The central notion when we talk of time and complexity is that of ‘memory’. Memory is carrying something from the past over into the future. Memory is filtered/interpreted, separating noise from information. Memory therefore is not an instantaneous thing, it takes time to develop; it is slow. The dynamics between the participating agents in the consultation will create shared memories that live on to shape future interactions. Shared memories are stronger and contain more relevant knowledge if they are based on frequent interactions and ongoing doctor–patient relationships, leading to a better understanding of the whole person – a process that takes time. Sufficient time, that is, ‘a certain slowness’, is an essential element of the healing relationship in the consultation. It creates a sufficiently stable, but adaptive, environment that can withstand changing demands. Hence a more complete understanding of the consultation and its time demands will not only lead to more effective treatment, it will also humanize a situation which has become to a large extent purely instrumental. This process of humanization is important not only for the patient, but also for the doctor
Keywords complexity  consultation length  philosophy of medicine  systems thinking  quality of care
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01270.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,044
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Plato's Conception of the Relations Between Moral Philosophy and Medicine.Mark Moes - 2001 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 (3):353-367.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Understanding Health Care Delivery as a Complex System.Joachim Sturmberg & Holly J. Lanham - 2014 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 20 (6):1005-1009.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Time Experience and Memory Processes.John A. Michon - 1975 - In J. T. Fraser & Nathaniel M. Lawrence (eds.), The Study of Time Ii. Springer Verlag.
Memory of Time in the Light of Flesh.Charles Scott - 1999 - Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):421-432.
Time, the Familiar Stranger.J. T. Fraser - 1987 - University of Massachusetts Press.
Memory, Amnesia, and the Past.Christoph Hoerl - 1999 - Mind and Language 14 (2):227-51.
The Time Machine in Our Mind.Kurt Stocker - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (3):385-420.
Re-Membering.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:43-59.
Out of the Past: Episodic Recall as Retained Acquaintance.Michael G. F. Martin - 2001 - In Christoph Hoerl & Teresa McCormack (eds.), Time and Memory. Oxford University Press. pp. 257--284.
Education and the Concept of Time.Leena Kakkori - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):571-583.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #482,197 of 2,433,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #172,561 of 2,433,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes