Determinism and Indeterminism in the Quantum Realm

Dissertation, University of Michigan (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If there's one lesson that philosophers seem to have learned from quantum mechanics it is that the quantum realm is governed by indeterministic laws. However, in 1952 David Bohm constructed a deterministic theory and proved that it is empirically equivalent to quantum mechanics. ;One of the three conditions that are together sufficient for the empirical adequacy of Bohm's theory is the statistical postulate. This postulate demands a very particular initial condition to hold for ensembles of quantum systems. I argue that the statistical postulate requires a justification. A justification would consist of showing how the dynamics of Bohm's theory is able to generate the initial conditions specified by the statistical postulate. ;I examine two deterministic justifications of the statistical postulate, one by Valentini and the other by Durr, Goldstein and Zanghi. I explain precisely the ways in which they are lacking. The basic problem is that crucial dynamical details are missing, ones needed to complete the justification. Whether these missing bits can be filled in is an open question. Until a justification is at hand, and its application to real-world ensembles is clarified, the empirical adequacy of Bohm's theory remains an open question. ;Bohm himself proposed a stochastic or indeterministic justification for the statistical postulate. It has been shown that the dynamics of this stochastic theory does not have the resources to justify the statistical postulate. In addition I show that the mathematical argument Bohm uses in his justification is flawed. Other stochastic theories do justify the statistical postulate but have other problems. ;The issue of indeterminism in the quantum realm is far from settled. Bohm's deterministic dynamics enables an investigation into the limits of a deterministic dynamics for the quantum realm. The properties of Bohm's deterministic equations of motion remain largely unknown. What we do know is that if the quantum realm is indeterministic it will not be for any of the reasons we have so far been given

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Measurement in Bohm's versus Everett's quantum theory.H. -D. Zeh - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (7):723-730.
Quantum statistical determinism.Eftichios Bitsakis - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (3):331-355.
Quantum indeterminism and evolutionary biology.David N. Stamos - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (2):164-184.
Indeterminism in neurobiology.Marcel Weber - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):663-674.
The Quasiclassical Realms of This Quantum Universe.James B. Hartle - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (6):982-1006.
Quantum mechanics without the projection postulate.Jeffrey Bub - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (5):737-754.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references