The black-and-white world: Towards the history of dual typologies of nationalism

Filozofija I Društvo 2005 (26):9-64 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Attempts at formulating a dichotomous classification of nations and nationalisms have proliferated in the relevant literature over a long period of time. In this study some of the most influential instances of dual typologies of nationalisms are selected for interpretation and analysis. The examples include Renan's under?standing of differences between the "French" and the "German" concepts of nation; Kohn's distinction between "eastern" and "western" nationalisms; a revision of Kohn's dichotomy suggested by J. Plamenatz; and a more recent version of dual typology propounded by L. Greenfield. By reconstructing the views of the selected theorists of nationalism, at the basis of all these typologies a dichotomous division into "civic" and "ethnic" nationalism is identified. Critical objections to this fundamental dual division are articulated at two levels. At the first, historical level, a socio-political contextualization of dual typologies points to their practical, political-ideological purposes. At the second, conceptual level, and drawing on the ideas of R. Brubaker, the author discusses analytical and normative weaknesses of the usual distinction between "civic" and "ethnic" nationalism. Literatura o nacijama i nacionalizmu svedoci o istorijski dugotrajnim pokusajima formulisanja dihotomne klasifikacije proucavanih fenomena. Stoga je autor u ovoj studiji interpretirao i analizirao neke od najuticajnijih primera dualnih tipologija nacionalizma. Predmet njegovog istrazivanja su Renanovo shvatanje razlika izmedju "francuskog" i "nemackog" pojma nacije, Konovo razlikovanje "istocnog" i "zapadnog" nacionalizma, Plamenceva revizija Konove dihotomije, kao i novija verzija dualnih tipologija Lie Grinfeld. Rekonstrukcijom stanovista izabranih teoreticara nacionalizma, autor u osnovi svih prikazanih tipologija identifikuje dihotomnu podelu na "gradjanski" i "etnicki nacionalizam". Kriticke primedbe ovoj osnovnoj dualnoj podeli formulisane su u dve razlicite ravni: istorijskoj i konceptualnoj. U prvoj, socijalno-politickom kontekstualizacijom dualnih tipologija naglasena je njihova prakticna, politicko-ideoloska funkcija. Oslanjajuci se na stavove R. Brubejkera, autor je u drugoj, teorijskoj ravni, istakao analiticke i normativne slabosti uobicajene podele na "gradjanski" i "etnicki nacionalizam".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Civic nationalism: Oxymoron?Nicholas Xenos - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (2):213-231.
Toward a liberal socialist cosmopolitan nationalism.Kai Nielsen - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):437 – 463.
Can patriotism save us from nationalism? Rejoinder to Viroli.Bernard Yack - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (1-2):203-206.
Bertrand Russell and the end of nationalism.Louis Greenspan - 1996 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (3):348-368.
Three Kinds of Nationalism.Andrew Oldenquist - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):63-72.
The myth of the civic nation.Bernard Yack - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (2):193-211.
What rough beast?Eugen Weber - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (2):285-298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
20 (#754,879)

6 months
4 (#790,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Nationalism and aggression.Liah Greenfeld & Daniel Chirot - 1994 - Theory and Society 23 (1):79-130.

Add more references