Philosophy Compass 7 (1):43-57 (2012)

Authors
Meghan Sullivan
University of Notre Dame
Abstract
A‐theorists of time postulate a deep distinction between the present, past and future. Settling on an appropriate logic for such a view is no easy matter. This Philosophy Compass article describes one of the most vexing formal problems facing A‐theorists. It is commonly thought that A‐theories can only be formally expressed in a tense logic: a logic with operators like P and F . And it seems natural to think that we live in a world where objects come to exist and cease to exist as time passes. Indeed, this is typically a key component of the most prominent kind of A‐theory, presentism. But the temporary existence assumption cannot be upheld in any tense logic with a standard quantification theory. I will explain the problem and outline the philosophical and logical considerations that generate it. I will then consider two possible solutions to the problem – one that targets our logic of quantification and one that targets our assumptions about change. I survey the costs of each solution
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00457.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,159
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Past, Present, and Future.Arthur Norman Prior - 1967 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Nonexistent Objects.Terence Parsons - 1980 - Yale University Press.
Truth and Ontology.Trenton Merricks - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (11):20-40.

View all 54 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Time.Ned Markosian - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Minimal A-Theory.Meghan Sullivan - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (2):149-174.
An A-Theory Without Tense Operators.Meghan Sullivan - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):735-758.
Boring Ontological Realism.Meghan Sullivan - 2017 - Res Philosophica 94 (3):399-413.
Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (6):406-419.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

‘Now’ and ‘Then’ in Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):229-247.
Predicate Metric Tense Logic for 'Now' and 'Then'.M. J. Cresswell - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):1-24.
Modal Logic, Truth, and the Master Modality.Torben Braüner - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):359-386.
Worlds and Times.Ulrich Meyer - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):25--37.
The Finite Model Property in Tense Logic.Frank Wolter - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (3):757-774.
A Note on the Interpolation Property in Tense Logic.Frank Wolter - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (5):545-551.
The Minimal A-Theory.Meghan Sullivan - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (2):149-174.
A–Theory for Tense Logicians.Josh Parsons - 2003 - Analysis 63 (1):4–6.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-01-13

Total views
154 ( #69,899 of 2,454,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,322 of 2,454,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes