Judgment as the Bridge Between Spectator and Actor: A Refutation of Beiner’s Interpretation of Arendt

European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 6 (Philosophy):113-121 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Arendt’s theory of judgment has puzzled her readers for a long time. Beiner and other scholars believe that Arendt has two different kinds of theories of judgment, and they also believe that the theory of judgment in Arendt’s later writings indicates that she has shifted her focus from action to mind. But this view is a misreading of Arendt. Arendt’s working always focus on the question “how can we act morally”, and there is only one theory of judgment for Arendt.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arendt, Kant, and the enigma of judgment.Martin Blumenthal-Barby - 2022 - Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Kant y Hannah Arendt.Jacinto Rivera de Rosales - 2005 - Ideas Y Valores 54 (128):1-33.
Hannah Arendt on judgement: Thinking for politics.Dianna Taylor - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (2):151 – 169.
Feeling Plurality. How Affectability Leads to Political Judgment.Héla Hecker - 2021 - In Maria Robaszkiewicz & Tobias Matzner (eds.), Hannah Arendt: Challenges of Plurality. Springer Verlag. pp. 127-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-29

Downloads
105 (#164,909)

6 months
105 (#51,351)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references