The swap of integral and limit in constructive mathematics

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (5):533-540 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Integration within constructive, especially intuitionistic mathematics in the sense of L. E. J. Brouwer, slightly differs from formal integration theories: Some classical results, especially Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, have tobe substituted by appropriate alternatives. Although there exist sophisticated, but rather laborious proposals, e.g. by E. Bishop and D. S. Bridges , the reference to partitions and the Riemann-integral, also with regard to the results obtained by R. Henstock and J. Kurzweil , seems to give a better direction. Especially, convergence theorems can be proved by introducing the concept of “equi-integrability”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
26 (#116,274)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Über die Neue Grundlagenkrise der Mathematik.Hermann Weyl - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (1):81-82.
Lebesgue Convergence Theorems and Reverse Mathematics.Xiaokang Yu - 1994 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 (1):1-13.
Constructive algebraic integration theory.Bas Spitters - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 137 (1-3):380-390.
Classifying Dini's Theorem.Josef Berger & Peter Schuster - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (2):253-262.

Add more references