Pap Arthur. Are individual concepts necessary? Philosophical studies, vol. 1 , pp. 17–24

Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):141-142 (1951)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are individual concepts necessary?Arthur Pap - 1950 - Philosophical Studies 1 (2):17 - 24.
Demonstratives as individual concepts.Paul Elbourne - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (4):409-466.
Reply to “arthur Pap on meaning rules”.Arthur Pap - 1960 - Philosophical Studies 11 (3):38 - 41.
Causal reasoning.Christoph Hoerl - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 152 (2):167-179.
The multimedia mnd: An analysis of Prinz on concepts.John Sarnecki - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (3):403-18.
The Individual in Simpler Forms.Arthur Russell Moore - 1946 - Philosophical Review 55:496.
History, the individual, and inevitability.John Passmore - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (1):93-102.
Concepts.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Absolute and restricted concepts.Arthur Smullyan - 1977 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):83 - 91.
A (leibnizian) theory of concepts.Edward N. Zalta - 2000 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 3:137-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
15 (#944,758)

6 months
7 (#425,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references