Comparison of three response-elimination procedures following FI and VI reinforcement training in humans

&
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (1):49-51 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03333390

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Comparison of six response-elimination techniques following VR reinforcement training in humans.John W. Pickering & Jeff S. Topping - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (4):264-266.
A within-subject comparison of three response-elimination procedures in pigeons.Jeff S. Topping & Thomas W. Ford - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (3):257-260.
Secondary Reinforcement in Children as a Function of Training Procedures.Jerome L. Myers & Nancy A. Myers - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):627.
Resistance to extinction as a function of percentage of reinforcement, number of training trials, and conditioned reinforcement.Norman Kass & Helen Wilson - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):355.
Comparison of omission training and extinction training in mentally retarded individuals.Jeff S. Topping, Helen J. Thompson & Billy A. Barrios - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (3):211-214.
A study of some relations among aperiodic reinforcement, discrimination training, and secondary reinforcement.J. M. Notterman - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):161.
Response decrement, induced by stimulus change, as a function of amount of training.Dalbir Bindra & John F. Seely - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5):317.
Continuous trial between- and within-subject partial reinforcement effect.J. Dutch & L. B. Brown - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):336.
Influence of a small number of partial reinforcement training trials on resistance to extinction.E. J. Capaldi & Dick Hart - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):166.
Effects of baseline self-reinforcement behavior and training level on posttraining self-reinforcement behavior.Albert Kozma & Pamela Easterbrook - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):256.
Acquisition and extinction of human eyelid conditioned response as a function of schedule of reinforcement and unconditioned stimulus intensity under two masked conditioning procedures.Bryce C. Schurr & Willard N. Runquist - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):398.
Competing responses and the partial-reinforcement effect.Donald F. McCoy & Melvin H. Marx - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (4):352.
Comparison of the relative effectiveness of instructions, modeling, and reinforcement procedures for inducing behavior change.John C. Masters & Marc N. Branch - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):364.
A preliminary study of training conditions necessary for secondary reinforcement.W. N. Schoenfeld, J. J. Antonitis & P. J. Bersh - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):40.
Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli.Harry I. Kalish & Norman Guttman - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (2):139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
11 (#1,137,779)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references