Misconceptions in recent papers on special relativity and absolute space theories

Foundations of Physics 12 (3):265-284 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several recent papers which purport to substantiate or negate arguments in favor of certain theories of absolute space have been based on fallacious principles. In this paper we discuss three related instances, indicating where misconceptions have arisen. We establish, contrary to popular belief, that the classical Lorentz ether theory accounts for all the experimental evidence which supports the special theory of relativity. We demonstrate that the ether theory predicts the null results obtained from pulsar timing and Mössbauer experiments. We conclude that a measurement of the one-way velocity of light has physical meaning within the context of the Lorentz theory, and argue that an adequately designed experiment to measure the one-way velocity of light should be attempted

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
24 (#155,087)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Philosophical Problems of Space and Time.V. F. Lenzen - 1975 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (1):127-129.
The special theory of relativity.David Bohm - 1965 - New York,: W.A. Benjamin.
Rotating disk experiments.Stefan Marinov - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (1-2):137-156.
Clock retardation, absolute space, and special relativity.Carlo Giannoni - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (5-6):427-444.

View all 6 references / Add more references