Second Amendment Sanctuaries: A Legally Dubious Protest Movement

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S4):105-111 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article assesses the origins and spread of the Second Amendment sanctuary movement in which localities pass ordinances or resolutions that declare their jurisdiction's view that proposed or enacted state gun safety laws are unconstitutional and therefore, local officials will not implement or enforce them. While it is important to assess Second Amendment sanctuaries from a legal perspective, it is equally as important to understand them in the context of a broader protest movement against any efforts to strengthen gun laws. As the gun violence prevention movement has gained strength across the United States, particularly at the state level, gun rights enthusiasts have turned to Second Amendment sanctuaries in order to create a counter narrative to the increasing political power of gun safety. By passing these ordinances or resolutions, local officials legitimize and fuel Second Amendment absolutism which poses real risks to public safety and democracy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-29

Downloads
10 (#1,204,939)

6 months
5 (#836,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

True Threats, Self-Defense, and the Second Amendment.Joseph Blocher & Bardia Vaseghi - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S4):112-118.

Add more references