David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Logica 66 (1):79-119 (2000)
We demonstrate ways to incorporate nondeterminism in a system designed to formalize the reasoning of agents concerning their abilities and the results of the actions that they may perform. We distinguish between two kinds of nondeterministic choice operators: one that expresses an internal choice, in which the agent decides what action to take, and one that expresses an external choice, which cannot be influenced by the agent. The presence of abilities in our system is the reason why the usual approaches towards nondeterminism cannot be used here. The semantics that we define for nondeterministic actions is based on the idea that composite actions are unravelled in the strings of atomic actions and tests that constitute them. The main notions used in defining this semantics are finite computation sequences and finite computation runs of actions. The results that we obtain meet our intuitions regarding events and abilities in the presence of nondeterminism.
|Keywords||Philosophy Logic Mathematical Logic and Foundations Computational Linguistics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Renate A. Schmidt, Dmitry Tishkovsky & Ullrich Hustadt (2004). Interactions Between Knowledge, Action and Commitment Within Agent Dynamic Logic. Studia Logica 78 (3):381-415.
Similar books and articles
Steffen Wettig & Eberhard Zehender (2004). A Legal Analysis of Human and Electronic Agents. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (1-2):111-135.
Susanne Bobzien (2006). Moral Responsibility and Moral Development in Epicurus’ Philosophy. In B. Reis & S. Haffmans (eds.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. CUP
Wiebe der Van Hoek (2000). On Agents That Have the Ability to Choose. Studia Logica 66 (1):79-119.
B. van Linder, W. van der Hoek & J.-J. Ch Meyer (1997). Seeing is Believing. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (1):33-61.
Andrew Eshleman (1997). Alternative Possibilities and the Free Will Defence. Religious Studies 33 (3):267-286.
Wiebe van Der Hoek, Bernd Van Linder & John-Jules Meyer (2000). On Agents That Have the Ability to Choose. Studia Logica 66 (1):79 - 119.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #295,204 of 1,903,041 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #264,928 of 1,903,041 )
How can I increase my downloads?