Why the Axiom of Choice Sometimes Fails

Logic Journal of the IGPL 28 (6):1207-1217 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The early controversies surrounding the axiom of choice are well known, as are the many results that followed concerning its dependence from, and equivalence to, other mathematical propositions. This paper focuses not on the logical status of the axiom but rather on showing why it fails in certain categories.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Axiom výběru a hypotéza kontinua – souvislosti a rozdíly.Tereza Slabá - 2023 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 45 (1):67-93.
Disasters in topology without the axiom of choice.Kyriakos Keremedis - 2001 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (8):569-580.
Rigit Unary Functions and the Axiom of Choice.Wolfgang Degen - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (2):197-204.
An Equivalence-Theoretic Equivalent of the Axiom of Choice.M. Armbrust - 1986 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 32 (6):95-95.
An Equivalence‐Theoretic Equivalent of the Axiom of Choice.M. Armbrust - 1986 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 32 (6):95-95.
Łoś's theorem and the axiom of choice.Eleftherios Tachtsis - 2019 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 65 (3):280-292.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-09

Downloads
11 (#1,166,624)

6 months
3 (#1,045,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic.R. I. Goldblatt - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (1):95-97.
Axioms in Mathematical Practice.Dirk Schlimm - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (1):37-92.
Cohesive toposes and Cantor's 'lauter einsen'.F. W. Lawvere - 1994 - Philosophia Mathematica 2 (1):5-15.

Add more references