The two-cardinal problem for languages of arbitrary cardinality

Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (3):785-801 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Let ℒ be a first-order language of cardinality κ++ with a distinguished unary predicate symbol U. In this paper we prove, working on L, the two cardinal transfer theorem (κ⁺,κ) ⇒ (κ++,κ⁺) for this language. This problem was posed by Chang and Keisler more than twenty years ago

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A gap 1 cardinal transfer theorem.Luis M. Villegas-Silva - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (4):340-350.
Characterizing all models in infinite cardinalities.Lauri Keskinen - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (3):230-250.
Undefinability of κ-well-orderings in l∞κ.Juha Oikkonen - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (3):999 - 1020.
Cardinal transfer properties in extender models.Ernest Schimmerling & Martin Zeman - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 154 (3):163-190.
An ideal characterization of mahlo cardinals.Qi Feng - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):467-473.
On Keisler singular‐like models.Shahram Mohsenipour - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (3):330-336.
Identity crises and strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter & James Cummings - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1895-1910.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
30 (#132,620)

6 months
9 (#1,260,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Model Theory.Michael Makkai, C. C. Chang & H. J. Keisler - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1096.
The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy.R. Björn Jensen - 1972 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 4 (3):229.
A gap 1 cardinal transfer theorem.Luis M. Villegas-Silva - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (4):340-350.

Add more references