High court case: Williams v the commonwealth

The Australian Humanist 107 (107):5 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wallace, Max On 20 June 2012 the High Court of Australia handed down their decision in Willliams v The Commonwealth. The case concerned the question of whether it was unconstitutional for the federal government to fund religious chaplains in public schools. The argument against the funding was on technical, financial grounds. The government had avoided making a law in the parliament to fund the chaplains. That way, they were able to avoid a legal complaint that the funding breached Australia's s.116, the section in the constitution that mimics America's First Amendment. The funding therefore would avoid a major dispute over separation of church and state

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Time for change: A new role for religion in education.Anna Halafoff - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 107 (107):5.
Rich enough? Do church schools need government money?Max Wallace - 2013 - The Australian Humanist 111 (111):7.
Australia and New Zealand are soft theocracies.Max Wallace - 2014 - Australian Humanist, The 113:11.
Framing New Zealand's funding of religious schools.Max Wallace - 2015 - Australian Humanist, The 117:19.
Free, compulsory and secular?Meg Wallace - forthcoming - Australian Humanist, The 123:8.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-19

Downloads
26 (#600,004)

6 months
26 (#139,494)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references