Book Review: Matthew 8–20: A Commentary [Book Review]

Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 57 (1):86-87 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Book Review: A Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew. [REVIEW]David R. Bauer - 2000 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 54 (4):432-434.
Book Review: Matthew 1–7: A Commentary. [REVIEW]John Y. H. Yieh - 2009 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 63 (2):180-182.
Book Review: Mark 8–16: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. [REVIEW]M. Eugene Boring - 2011 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 65 (2):198-200.
Matthew 5:17-20.Paul W. Walaskay - 2002 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 56 (4):417-420.
Book Review: Matthew. [REVIEW]Dorothy Jean Weaver - 2008 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 62 (1):86-88.
Book Review: Methods for Matthew. [REVIEW]Eugene Eung-Chun Park - 2011 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 65 (4):427-427.
Book Review: The Gospel of Matthew. [REVIEW]Warren Carter - 2003 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 57 (3):322-322.
Book Review: Ecclesiastes: The JPS Bible Commentary. [REVIEW]James L. Crenshaw - 2005 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 59 (2):192-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
74 (#77,784)

6 months
74 (#216,861)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references