- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The case against evolutionary ethics today
In Jane Maienschein & Michael Ruse (eds.), Biology and the foundation of ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 276--306 (1999)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Moral commitment without objectivity or illusion: Comments on Ruse and Woolcock.Bruce N. Waller - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):245-254.
Darwin's Romantic Biology. The Foundation of His Evolutionary Ethics'.Robert Richards - 1999 - In Jane Maienschein & Michael Ruse (eds.), Biology and the foundation of ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 113--53.
French Evolutionary Ethics during the Third Republic: Jean de Lanessan.Paul Lawrence Farber - 1999 - In Jane Maienschein & Michael Ruse (eds.), Biology and the foundation of ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Book review of Peter Wenz, Environmental Ethics Today. [REVIEW]Ned Hettinger - 2004 - Conservation Biology 18 (2):587-588.
In memoriam: Carl G. (peter) Hempel 1905--1997. [REVIEW]James G. Lennox - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):477-480.
Review of Gary L. Comstock, Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology. [REVIEW]Paul B. Thompson - 2001 - Agriculture and Human Values 18 (3):341-345.
Evolution, Morality and the Law: On Valerie J. Grant’s Case Against Sex Selection.Edgar Dahl - 2006 - Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bioethics in Human Reproduction Research in the Muslim World 21 (12):3303-3304.
Social humanism: A new metaphysics [Book Review].Peter G. Woolcock - 2013 - The Australian Humanist 109 (109):21.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-26
Downloads
1 (#1,913,683)
6 months
42 (#98,106)
2014-01-26
Downloads
1 (#1,913,683)
6 months
42 (#98,106)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Debunking morality: Evolutionary naturalism and moral error theory.Hallvard Lillehammer - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (4):567-581.
Normative Ethics Does Not Need a Foundation: It Needs More Science.Katinka Quintelier, Linda Van Speybroeck & Johan Braeckman - 2010 - Acta Biotheoretica 59 (1):29-51.
Evolutionary Naturalism and the Logical Structure of Valuation: The Other Side of Error Theory.Richard A. Richards - 2006 - Cosmos and History : The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 1 (2):270-294.
Evolutionary naturalism and the logical structure of valuation: The other side of error theory.Richard A. Richards - 2005 - Cosmos and History 1 (2):270-294.
O nekim konceptualnim i eksplanatornim poteškoćama evolucijske etike.Tomislav Bracanović - 2005 - Prolegomena 4 (1):49-70.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-dxklk uwo