Review of: Eemeren, F.H. van, Garssen, B, and Meuffels, B. . "Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness"

Cogency - Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 2 (1):149-165 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules: Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, Volume 16 of the Springer Argumentation Library. ISBN: 978-90-481-2613-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9. HB: $139.00. [REVIEW]Dale Hample - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):375-381.
Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules: Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, Volume 16 of the Springer Argumentation Library. ISBN: 978-90-481-2613-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9. HB: $139.00.Dale Hample - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):375-381.
Review of F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (eds) (2008). Controversy and Confrontation. Amsterdam: John Benjamis. [REVIEW]Frank Zenker - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (4):447-475.
Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen : Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory: Springer, 2015, 293 pp.Sara Greco - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (1):213-220.
E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren. [REVIEW]Paul den Hoven - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):409-412.
Review of Van Eemeren & Garssen’s Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Vasco Correia - 2013 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 5 (2):173-192.
Arguing With Asperger Syndrome.Albert Atkin, J. E. Richardson & C. Blackmore - 2007 - In Albert Atkin, J. E. Richardson & C. Blackmore (eds.), Proceedings of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). pp. 1141-1146.
E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren: John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 2011. [REVIEW]Paul van den Hoven - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):409-412.
E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren: John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 2011. [REVIEW]Paul van den Hoven - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):409-412.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-13

Downloads
1 (#1,913,104)

6 months
1 (#1,516,021)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Zenker
Nankai University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references