How Theology Looks at Neurotheology

Balkan Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):195-204 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss neurotheology and its scope as defined by natural scientists. In my opinion, in denying the paranormal world this science has failed to present criteria to distinguish “genuine” from “non-genuine” religious experiences. However, this science can be used to recognize revelation, inspiration, true dreams, and feelings of no-space, no-time, and annihilation of the human body in mysticism, but we should not attribute genuine experiences to mental disorders, since genuine experiences can be distinguished from non-genuine ones.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Neurotheology Explain Religion?Dave Vliegenthart - 2011 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 33 (2):137-171.
Is mental time travel real time travel?Michael Barkasi & Melanie G. Rosen - 2020 - Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 1 (1):1-27.
Schizophrenia and Yogic Concepts.Dr Hitesh C. Sheth - 2013 - International Journal of Yoga - Philosophy, Psychology and Parapsychology 1 (1):34-39.
Genuine Individuals and Genuine Communities. [REVIEW]D. Micah Hester - 1999 - Newsletter of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy 27 (83):74-77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-17

Downloads
1 (#1,898,347)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references