Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Ambiguity" by Adam Sennet

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations, Pickard-Cambridge (trans.), in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Aristotle, Metaphysics, W.D. Ross (trans.), in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Atherton, Catherine, 1993. The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Atlas, Jay, 1989. Philosophy Without Ambiguity: A Logico-Linguistic Essay, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Bach, Kent, 1982. “Semantic Nonspecificity and Mixed Quantifiers,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 4: 593–605. (Scholar)
–––, 1999. “The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters,” in The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, K. Turner (ed.), Oxford: Elsevier, 65–84. (Scholar)
Baker, Mark, 1997. “Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure,” in Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, 73–137. (Scholar)
Bezuidenhout, Anne, 2002. “Truth-Conditional Pragmatics,” Philosophical Perspectives, 16: 105–134. (Scholar)
Bittner, Maria, 2007. “Online Update: Temporal, Modal, and de Se Anaphora in Polysynthetic Discourse,” in Chris Barker & Pauline Jacobson (eds.), Direct Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Braun, David, and Theodore Sider, 2007. “Vague, So Untrue”, in Noûs, 41(2): 133–156. (Scholar)
Camp, Elisabeth, 2006. “Metaphor and That Certain ‘Je Ne Sais Quoi’,” Philosophical Studies, 129: 1–25. (Scholar)
Carlson, Greg N., 1982. “Generic Terms and Generic Sentences,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11: 145–181. (Scholar)
Carlson, Greg N. and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 1995. The Generic Book, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Chomsky, Noam, 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Cruse, D. Alan, 1986. Lexical Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Culicover, P.W. and R. Jackendoff, 2005. Simpler Syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Davidson, Donald, 1967. “Truth and Meaning”, Synthese, 17: 304–323. (Scholar)
Dayal, Veneeta, 2004. “The Universal Force of Free Choice Any,” Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 4: 5–40. (Scholar)
Doetjes, J., 2011, “Count/Mass Distinctions Across Languages” in Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (Volume 3: Chapter 96), Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, Paul Portner (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. (Scholar)
Donnellan, Keith S., 1966. “Reference and Definite Descriptions,” Philosophical Review, 75: 281–304. (Scholar)
Dunbar, George, 2001. “Towards a Cognitive Analysis of Polysemy, Ambiguity and Vagueness,” Cognitive Linguistics, 12: 1–14. (Scholar)
Fara, Delia Graff, 2000. “Shifting Sands: An Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness,” Philosophical Topics, 28: 45–81 (originally published under the name “Delia Graff”). (Scholar)
Field, Hartry, 1973. “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference,” Journal of Philosophy, 70: 462–81. (Scholar)
Fiengo, Robert and Robert May, 1994. Indices and Identity (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 24), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Fodor, Jerry, 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Frege, Gottlob, 1948 [1892]. “Sense and Reference,” The Philosophical Review, 53: 209–230.
Giannakidou, Anastasia, 2001. “The Meaning of Free Choice,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 24: 659–735. (Scholar)
Gillon, Brendan, 1990. “Ambiguity, generality, and indeterminacy,” Synthese, 85: 391–416; extended version, in Semantics: A Reader, Gillon and Davis (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Greenough, Patrick, 2003. “Vagueness: A Minimal Theory,” Mind, 112: 235–81. (Scholar)
Grice, H. P., 1975. “Logic and Conversation,” in Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Cole and Morgan (eds.), New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
Grimshaw, Jane, 1992. Argument Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Heim, Irene, 1983. “File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness,” in Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, Bäuerle, Schwarze and von Stechow (eds.), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 164–90; reprinted in Portner and Partee (eds.), 2002, 223–248. (Scholar)
–––, 1989. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, New York: Garland. (Scholar)
Herburger, Elena, 2000. What Counts: Focus and Quantification (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs: Volume 36), Cambridge. MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Hobbs, Jerry, 1979. “Coherence and coreference” in Cognitive Science, Los Angeles, CA, 432–5. (Scholar)
–––, 1985. “Granularity,” in A. Joshi (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th IJCAI (Volume 1), Los Angeles, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 432–5. (Scholar)
Horn, Laurence, 2000. “Any and (-)ever: Free choice and free relatives,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics, 71–111. (Scholar)
Jacobson, Pauline, 1999. “Towards a Variable-Free Semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 117–184. (Scholar)
Kadmon, Nirit and Fred Landman, 1993: “Any,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 16: 353–422. (Scholar)
Kamp, J. A. W., 1981. “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation,” in Formal Methods in the Study of Language, J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.), Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre, 277–322. (Scholar)
Kratzer, Angelika, 1977. “What ‘Must’ and ‘Can’ Must and Can Mean,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 1: 337–355. (Scholar)
Kripke, Saul, 1977. “Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2: 255–276. (Scholar)
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara, 2007. “Polysemy, Prototypes and Radial Categories”. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–169. (Scholar)
Lepore, Ernie and Stone, Matthew, 2014. Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
May, Robert, 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1991. The Grammar of Quantification, New York: Garland; this is a facsimile edition of the 1977 MIT Ph.D. Dissertation, with 1991 preface. (Scholar)
McKay, Thomas, 2006. Plural Predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Montague, Richard, 1973. “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English,” in R. Montague, Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, R. Thomason (ed.), New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974, 247–270. (Scholar)
Neale, Stephen, 1975. Descriptions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Murray, Sarah E. and Starr, William B., 2018. “Force and Conventional States,” in New Work on Speech Acts, Daniel Fogal, Daniel W. Harris, and Matt Moss (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Nunberg, Geoffrey, 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference, Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. (Scholar)
–––, 1995. “Transfers of Meaning,” Journal of Semantics, 12: 109–32. (Scholar)
Partee, Barbara H., 1986. “Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles,” in Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Groenendijk, de Jongh and M. Stokhof (eds.), Dordrecht: Foris, 115–143; reprinted in Portner and Partee (eds.), 2002, 357–381; reprinted in B. Partee, Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara H. Partee, Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, 203–230. (Scholar)
Partee, Barbara H., and Mats Rooth, 1983. “Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity,” in Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, Bäuerle, Schwarze and von Stechow (eds.), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 361–83; reprinted in Portner and Partee (eds.), 2002, 334–356. (Scholar)
Pelletier, F. Jeffry, 1975. “Non-singular reference: some preliminaries,” Philosophia, 5(4): 451–465. (Scholar)
Pietroski, Paul, 2005. “Meaning Before Truth,” in Contextualism in Philosophy, Preyer and Peters (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Pietroski, Paul and Norbert Hornstein, 2002. “Does Every Sentence Like This Exhibit A Scope Ambiguity?” in Belief and Meaning, Hinzen and Rott (eds.), Frankfurt: Hansel-Hohenhausen. (Scholar)
Pynchon, Thomas, 2006, Against the Day, Penguin Press. (Scholar)
Quine, W. V., 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” The Philosophical Review, 60: 20–43. (Scholar)
–––, 1960. Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Recanati, Francois, 1989. “The Pragmatics of What is Said,” Mind and Language, 4: 295–329; reprinted in Pragmatics: A Reader, Davis (ed.), 1991. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–120. (Scholar)
–––, 2004. Literal Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Rooth, Mats, 1992. “A Theory of Focus Interpretation,” Natural Language Semantics, 1: 75–116. (Scholar)
Ryle, Gilbert, 1949. The Concept of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Sag, Ivan, 1976. Deletion and Logical Form, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; published, New York: Garland Publishing, 1980. (Scholar)
Saka, Paul, 2007. How to Think About Meaning. Dordrecht: Springer. (Scholar)
Schein, Barry, 2006. “Plurals”, in Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 716–767. (Scholar)
Schwarzschild, Roger, 2002. “Singleton Indefinites,” Journal of Semantics, 19: 289–314. (Scholar)
Searle, John R., 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Shakespeare, William, Romeo and Juliet, any edition.
Smith, Nicholas, 2005. “Vagueness as Closeness,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 83: 157 –183. (Scholar)
Smyth, Ron, 1994. “Grammatical Determinants of Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23: 197–229. (Scholar)
Spade, P. V., 1996. Thoughts, Words and Things: An Introduction to Late Mediaeval Logic and Semantic Theory, Version 1.0. Bloomington: Indiana University. (Scholar)
Stone, Matthew and Daniel Hardt, 1997. “Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals,” Proceedings of IWCS, 2: 287–299. (Scholar)
Strawson, P. F., 1950. “On Referring,” Mind, 59: 320–344. (Scholar)
Tuggy, David, 1993. “Ambiguity, Polysemy and Vagueness,” Cognitive Linguistics, 4: 273–290. (Scholar)
Vicente, A., & Falkum, I. 2017. ‘Polysemy,’ in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vicente & Falkum 2017 available online. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.325. (Scholar)
Viebahn, E., 2018. “Ambiguity and Zeugma,” in Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 99(4): 749–762. (Scholar)
Ward, Gregory, 2004. “Equatives and Deferred Reference,” Language, 80: 262–289. (Scholar)
Williams, Edwin, 1977. “Discourse and Logical Form,” Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1): 101–139. (Scholar)
Williams, Edwin, 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Zwicky, Arnold M. and Jerrold M. Sadock, 1975. “Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them,” in Syntax and Semantics (Volume IV), J. Kimball (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 1–36. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Sep 8 02:53:02 2024

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...