- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
From PhilPapers forum Logic and Philosophy of Logic:
| 2012-04-07 |
Is it impossible to suppose the Liar?
Reply to Kris Rhodes |
|
Camil Cardas
Aarhus University |
There is reasonable doubt concerning (4). Not only is the individuation of thoughts problematic, but it seems that to suppose X is NOT to entertain a single thought. The fact that (2) is true does not mean/ entail that I entertain a single thought. Nor can I assume that.
|
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo